Are we truly preparing the next generation of chemists to tackle real-world challenges? This question lies at the heart of a transformative approach to analytical science education, as exemplified by David S. Hage, a pioneering figure in the field. In an insightful interview with LCGC International, Hage, the James Hewett University Professor at the University of Nebraska–Lincoln and recipient of the prestigious 2025 Eastern Analytical Symposium (EAS) Award, reveals how he’s reshaping the way emerging chemists are trained. But here’s where it gets intriguing: it’s not just about teaching techniques—it’s about fostering a mindset of critical thinking, data integrity, and practical application that most traditional programs overlook.
Hage’s philosophy centers on bridging the gap between classroom theory and real-world problem-solving. He argues that chemists must be equipped not only to master analytical techniques but also to evaluate data critically, validate methods rigorously, and apply their knowledge to complex biological and environmental challenges. This is the part most people miss: without these skills, even the most advanced techniques fall short in addressing pressing global issues.
And this is where the controversy begins. While many institutions focus on technical proficiency, Hage challenges the status quo by emphasizing the importance of mentorship and hands-on experience. His research lab is a testament to this approach, focusing on four interconnected areas that push the boundaries of analytical science:
- Chromatographic immunoassays—a fusion of high specificity and traditional separation techniques, offering unprecedented precision in analysis.
- Biological interaction studies—using affinity methods to unravel binding kinetics and stoichiometry, a critical yet often neglected aspect of biochemical research.
- Innovative supports and immobilization strategies—enhancing the robustness and selectivity of analytical methods, which is crucial for real-world applications.
- Miniaturized and microfluidic separation systems—revolutionizing rapid analysis in personalized medicine and environmental monitoring.
With over 350 peer-reviewed publications, including the seminal Handbook of Affinity Chromatography, Hage’s influence extends far beyond the lab. As Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Chromatography B and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, he’s a leading voice in the field. Yet, his most impactful work may be in education. As the lead author of Analytical Chemistry and Quantitative Analysis, he’s shaping the minds of future scientists, a role recognized by awards like the College Distinguished Teaching Award and international accolades from the IFCC and AACC.
But here’s the thought-provoking question: In an era of rapid technological advancement, are we prioritizing innovation at the expense of foundational skills? Hage’s approach suggests a balance is not only possible but essential. His success in both research and education invites us to reconsider how we train the next generation of chemists. What do you think? Is the current focus on technical skills enough, or should critical thinking and practical application take center stage? Share your thoughts in the comments—let’s spark a conversation that could shape the future of analytical science.
Join the global community of analytical scientists who trust LCGC for cutting-edge insights, trends, and expert solutions in chromatography. Subscribe to our newsletter and be part of the dialogue that’s redefining the field.
