The sting of a major talent exodus hits hard, especially when it's a baseball insider like Rachel Folden leaving the Cubs behind—it's like losing a secret weapon just as the team gears up for another season. As we navigate the inevitable churn of the offseason, where good people move on, it's tough not to feel that pang of disappointment. But let's dive into what this departure means for the Cubs organization and why it might just be a catalyst for fresh energy and growth. Stick around, because this isn't just about one coach—it's a peek into the dynamic world of minor league development that keeps baseball fans on the edge of their seats.
And this is the part most people miss: how a single departure can ripple through an entire farm system. Triple-A Iowa Hitting Coach and co-Minor League Hitting Coordinator Rachel Folden is making the jump to the New York Mets organization, taking on the role of hitting coach at Double-A Binghamton. As reported by Mike Puma on X (formerly Twitter), this move marks a new chapter for Folden after a standout season with the Cubs. Greg Huss echoed the sentiment on the platform, calling it a "massive blow" and noting how Folden's influence is woven into the fabric of the Cubs' prospects. Her approach has clearly left an indelible mark, much like a master craftsman shaping the next generation of talent.
But here's where it gets controversial: is her gender a factor in the praise, or is it purely her skill that draws the spotlight? It's worth noting that Folden is a trailblazer in a predominantly male profession, but that's not the reason she's so esteemed or why her exit feels like such a setback. From all reports, including an MLB feature on her work, Rachel Folden excelled at her role, guiding some of the Cubs' top positional prospects as they advanced through the minors. Think of it like this: as young players climbed the rungs of the minor league ladder, so did Folden, rising through the ranks alongside them. The athletes, of course, deserve the lion's share of credit for their hard-earned progress, but coaches like Folden play a pivotal part—offering tailored advice, refining techniques, and instilling confidence. For instance, imagine a prospect struggling with plate discipline; Folden's guidance might involve drills that build patience and swing selection, turning potential into performance. That's why she moved up so swiftly, and why the Mets saw her as a valuable addition to their staff.
Interestingly, this new position at Double-A Binghamton isn't technically a promotion, which raises eyebrows for someone with Folden's rising-star status. Could there be hidden perks, like more autonomy in coaching methods or innovative approaches to player development, that made the Mets' offer irresistible? Or perhaps it's the lure of a different organizational culture, better compensation, or even a shift in location that tipped the scales. We can only speculate on the behind-the-scenes factors—whether it's the thrill of joining a contending team or personal growth opportunities—but what's clear is that Folden has been an integral asset to the Cubs for the past six years, contributing to a system that's produced a steady stream of talent.
Yet, as bittersweet as this loss is, it's simply the nature of running a thriving baseball operation. Organizations that excel foster the development of not just players, but coaches, scouts, and executives too. Over time, some of these key figures will depart, much like alumni leaving a college program to pursue new horizons. The key is to adapt and innovate—perhaps by scouting new coaches who can bring fresh perspectives, or promoting from within to fill the gap. This turnover, while painful, often leads to reinvigoration. For example, the Cubs could look to someone with a similar emphasis on data-driven hitting strategies or mentorship, ensuring continuity in helping prospects like those who've benefited from Folden's tutelage.
So, what's your take? Do you think Folden's move represents a missed opportunity for the Cubs to retain top talent, or is it a fair part of the baseball ecosystem's natural evolution? And here's a provocative twist: could the emphasis on her gender in discussions sometimes overshadow her pure coaching prowess, leading to unfair biases in how we evaluate achievements? I'd love to hear your thoughts in the comments—agree, disagree, or share your own experiences with coaching changes in sports. Let's keep the conversation going!
Written by
Brett Taylor is the Lead Baseball Writer at Bleacher Nation. You can find him on X at @Brett_A-Taylor, on Bluesky at @Brett-Taylor, and on LinkedIn here. Brett is also the founder of Bleacher Nation, which launched in 2008 as an independent blog focused on the Chicago Cubs. It has since expanded to cover other Chicago sports, becoming one of the web's premier regional sports sites.
